|
canaan1967
If you eliminate sugar and most anything that tastes sweet (there are about 30 names for sweeteners, natural and synthetic) and stay away from white, processed cereal grains I guarantee all of you that you will keep a good 20 to 40 pounds off and be able to eat nearly anything you want and still maintain your weight. I can eat nearly 4,000 calories a day and I can't gain weight for 3 years now that I have followed above advise.
juicy8956
Americans are fat , Latins and forgienz have beast bodies they take care of there body , it's been proven latins have beast bodies . Americans are fat
icarmelo2
@ledhed70 Please read a little bit about the subject. You have an opinion and just that .... you don't KNOW shit.
Read the latest research, read Gary's book, read time magazine ... read!!! Stop writing about something you now nothing about.
Read is good for you
FatHeadMovie
@karmuppet I ended up with a lot less respect for scientists after working the film, at least those in the health/nutrition fields. Spurlock's company is called The Con. We should've known ...
karmuppet
i'm reading Good Calories,Bad Calories thanks to seeing it mentioned in Fathead.
I'm so G-D mad at how bogus nutritional "research" became accepted and how everyone repeats it now like it's gospel. and i enjoy Morgan Spurlocks documentaries but he needs to be kicked in the 'nads for his distortions in Supersize Me.
Emunahgal
I like how these clips explain everything is very simple terms and use simple graphics and animation! Makes it VERY easy to understand it all!!!
CapitanoGUC
@ledhed70 the frencch food is just full of fat, you knowlegeless mupet ...:-D
MsFUCW
Medical students 30+ years ago probably read textbooks that suggested that carbohydrate drives insulin drives fat accumulation, end of story, but more modern textbooks indicate that the process of fat storage is more complex than that: adipo-insights.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-fable-of-unfettered-fat-burning.html
FatHeadMovie
@ledhed70 Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, volume 2010: "Our results suggest that diets with a high GI and high GL were positively associated with blood lipid levels that posed an elevated CHD risk, independent of other known risk factors."
I know I'm just a comedian and therefore unqualified to interpret straightforward English sentences in study documents, but it sounds to me as if the researchers are blaming sugar and refined starches for elevated heart-disease risk.
FatHeadMovie
@ledhed70 Obesity reviews, July 2008, a meta-analysis of low-fat vs. low-carb diets: "There were significant differences between the groups for weight, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triacylglycerols and systolic blood pressure, favouring the low-carbohydrate diet."
Low carb wins for improvements in weight, LDL, triglycerides, HDL, and blood pressure ... damn, those American paradoxes are really adding up. |